Mxz 700 Gas Mileage - Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 07:50 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
I bought two used snowmobiles this year - 98 SkiDoo SLE 500 Touring and a 2001 MXZ 700. I've put on about 300 miles now in the last couple of weeks. I've noticed that I get extremely good gas mileage on the MXZ compared to the F7's, Polaris XC700's, and the Rev. 600. In fact I would say almost twice as good and riding the machines together from gas pump to gas pump. Now today I had both machines out together for about 80 miles and at the gas pump they were nearly identical for mileage!!!!

I'm certainly not complaining. I laughed a lot at the other 700's but I started to worry when I got the same mileage as a 500 fan cooled machine. I don't have much experience with snowmobiles (about 300 miles in my entire life). It seems to perform right there with the other 700's and I've been about 50/50 trail riding and lake riding in cold weather (+5 to -20F). Is this common for the MXZ 700? I'd feel better if some other MXZ people would tell me that's how it's supposed to be. I find myself staring at the machine after I fill it up wondering if there's maybe another place I'm supposed to put more gas......
waynorth is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 07:56 PM
Senior Member
 
dpaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere, where I don't know where I am.
Posts: 1,327
Send a message via MSN to dpaige
The 700 twin is VERY good on fuel for some reason, my 2000 FZ700 was exactly the same.
dpaige is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 08:00 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally posted by dpaige@Jan 3 2005, 07:18 PM
The 700 twin is VERY good on fuel for some reason, my 2000 FZ700 was exactly the same.
[snapback]383712[/snapback]

So you didn't give up performance or anything for this mileage - that's just the way these machines are???
waynorth is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 08:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 313
My 02 MXZ 700 would get 110 miles to a tank on average or 175kms. Most I ever got was 191kms and that was on fumes!!!. Much better than the 800's I rode with.
ski-doorider is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 08:20 PM
Senior Member
 
mxz7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pete @ Watertown,WI
Posts: 3,522
Send a message via MSN to mxz7
I was very unhappy with my gas sucking pig 02 700 mxz. The thing ran out of gas with only 87 miles on the tank last year. I didn't try to investigate why,I just traded it for an SDI that gets better than 15 mpg.
mxz7 is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-03-2005, 09:53 PM
Senior Member
 
mudweiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Saint Joseph, Minnesota
Posts: 1,131
I found the same results. My 01 700 did better on gas then a 2002 XCSP 600 and other smaller cc sleds. That was of course when it was stock.

If you need help always ask the one who is busy, the others have no time!!
mudweiser is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-04-2005, 08:38 AM
journeyman sled/motorhead
 
dooman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana/Irons michigan
Posts: 4,440
Send a message via Yahoo to dooman
my 700 gets better mpg than the wifes gt 600.

"DREAM AS THOUGH YOU'LL LIVE FOREVER, LIVE AS THOUGH YOU'RE GOING TO DIE TOMMORROW" JAMES DEAN
dooman is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-04-2005, 08:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planfield, il(home) / Peoria, il (school)
Posts: 231
Send a message via AIM to Mr-siv
a few comments to make-
WOT or near WOT for extended periods of time will destroy your gas mileage. if you ride like that (lots of lakes, powder, etc) expect mileage you can count on one hand. if you go easy on it on the trails you will get pretty good mileage. varaitations of +/- 8 mpg between riding styles would not be uncommin.

fan cooled sleds, generaly, do not get the best fuel economy. few reasons for this, first off the are jetted richer than their l/c counterparts to help cool off the engine. seccond, they make a lot less horsepower than comparable displacement l/c sleds, so if you've got a fan guy trying to keep up with l/c sleds, hes going to be on the gas a lot more.

just some thoughs,

- Jason

1990 BMW 325i/e30- daily driver/toy
1965 mustang - in restoration

Check out my website

Curently own:
1993 'doo mach1 (670) ...................(mine)
1995 polaris supper sport (440 fan) ..(sisters)
1998 cat pantera 800 ......................(dads)
Mr-siv is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-04-2005, 10:08 AM
Senior Member
 
dpaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere, where I don't know where I am.
Posts: 1,327
Send a message via MSN to dpaige
Quote:
Originally posted by waynorth@Jan 3 2005, 06:22 PM
So you didn't give up performance or anything for this mileage - that's just the way these machines are???
[snapback]383715[/snapback]

I didn't notice any performance loss, actually, the sled would stay with a few 800 MXZ's that I've ridden with.

I've got an SDI now and a buddy now owns my old 700 and they are VERY close in the fuel mileage they get.

dpaige is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 01-04-2005, 04:01 PM
Member
 
ccarbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to ccarbo
FYI,
I have a 2000 Mxz 700 and also get great mileage and its good on oil too. I can compare when filling up to a Cat ZL 500! I can reach over 100 miles to a tank. I ride pretty hard too. though WOT riding will kill the mileage.
ccarbo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome