: New sled or new truck
z800rotax 03-30-2002, 10:32 PM All right the sled and truck are paid for so it's time to go in the hole again http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif I just can't decide whether i keep the 01
mxz800 with only 4000km or keep the 97 ram with 100 000km
that is in mint shape http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif Any suggestion would be appreciated
or any long term forecasts for next winter http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif
Rocketman 03-30-2002, 10:54 PM Easy....bye bye Ram....hello Silverado!
BUTCH800 03-31-2002, 12:08 AM Gotta agree with Rocketman. Although, you shouldn't pull an old sled with a new truck. Or, pull a new sled with an old truck. Heck....you might as well get a new trailer too!!!!
Laakefly 03-31-2002, 01:00 PM Also agree with Rocketman. *Good bye ram hello Sierra or silverado...........
paul yarek 03-31-2002, 01:40 PM Mr.z800rtx is a dodge man through and through although he lives in GM world.
*hey z800rtx i bought a car from marigold the other day.
800REV 03-31-2002, 01:45 PM If you really want to go into the hole, buy both. http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
z800rotax 03-31-2002, 05:55 PM I'm sorta leanin towards the new truck right now and it won't be a chev or a ford http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif One pos gmc in the driveway is enough
for me.So ya deal with the souch's do ya paul?Did ya make it to teddy's for some chow while you were out in this neck of the woods http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif The beer fridge is always full paul http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
Go with the new truck!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif
nick gehring 03-31-2002, 10:39 PM Deck out a new Sierra! * Put on a 6" lift & 36" MT's! *mxz7 whats with the new avatar?
http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif
Nick,The forum was slow,and I got bored.
Are you the lift master,I was thinking about a 3" body lift and 33"s on my '96 Suburban.I already put 2" blocks in back and cranked up the torsion bars in front.Looks good now but not quite up there enough if ya know what I mean. http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
03 440 PRO X 04-01-2002, 01:42 AM GET THE NEW RAM WITH THE NEW CUMMINGS DIESEL, THEN YOU CAN PULL ALL THE SLEDS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND ALSO HAVE THE NOISEIEST DIESEL AROUND
http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/withstupid.gif
performancex 04-01-2002, 05:50 PM I would say, since you got 'em both paid off, start putting more money into them. *Modify the heck out of both! *Better performance, better looks. *Better toys.
z800rotax 04-01-2002, 06:01 PM Allready stuffed diesel coils in the front and extra springs in the back for some bigger meats,a mild lift but rams allready got some height to em.It's had the mopar catback exhaust since it was 6mths old,plus stereo and other goodies.Sled has all i'm gonna do to it done already.Maybe i'll just buy lots of beer this summer http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
WINTERFREAK 04-01-2002, 09:06 PM Go 4 the new sled *http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif On the trail it don't matter what truck got you there.....it's all sled baby!!!! *http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
jwheeler 04-01-2002, 09:08 PM New sled!!! *Thats a no brainer. http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
paul yarek 04-02-2002, 12:20 AM go with the sled
mxz7,
*what did i tell you ? i said nick gehring is going to make a comment about that avatar. LOL *http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
Snow Monkey 04-02-2002, 12:28 AM http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif buy both!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
midnight screamer 04-02-2002, 01:58 AM I think it depends on what sled you are getting! *I think the truck could hold off another year. *Put a good 150,000 on her then get a new one!
http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif
Machzzzz1 04-02-2002, 10:39 AM Your dodge is still young. *I know someone that has a 1984 dodge ram with 650000km on it. *Still using the original clutch. *Mostly because he powershifts it. *
Slant 6 with 4 speed hurst. *
Still pulls his sleds. *
If you are getting a truck get the new ram with the cumming desil 305hp or the 5.7L hemi 345hp. *Both those trucks will kick ###.
I also dont like chevy because of there posi traction system. *Unlike dodge who uses a bullit proof clutch system which is more like a locker, chevy uses a system that will engage the other wheel once one has spun faster then 100rpm. *At 100Rpm when the other one engages it tears the teeth of the engagin gear destroying the posi leaving you with a open diff. *
I figure that out of 8 chevy 3 or 4 dont have posi even though they think they do. *Not good for a sleder who needs traction in the snow.
Rocketman 04-02-2002, 11:13 AM The Chevy posi system is engaged until you hit 40km\h. It the has a system which disengages the posi, allowing only one wheel to turn.
Machzzzz1 04-02-2002, 12:10 PM The chevy system is never engaged until one tire spins up to 100 rpm faster then the other. *That jolt is what brakes the posi. *
I know this from a few guys that work at a dealership and have to replace these things constantly. *Even opened up a few and normally there are metal parts stuck on to the magnet or drain plug. *Its the sad truth and there should be a recall. *All you can do to avoid it is drive very wimpy on slipery stuff so the engagement isnt that hard.
One thing there is no question about is that dodge's rear end is much stronger then chevy and more efficent. *Dynos prove it. *
THe 4.7L makes 235 at the crank on a dakota. *the 5.3 makes 280 (i think) *But on a dyno the 4.7 makes more Rear wheel hp because chevys drivetrain robs it of a lot of hp.
z800rotax 04-02-2002, 12:58 PM I agree with machzzz1 on the gm posi.The system dodge uses
is superior as long as both back wheels are on similar traction
conditions.But nothing beats air lockers front/rear and ya get to have an onboard air compressor with that system http://www.snowmobileworld-s2.com/forums/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
|