» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
|
» Buyers Guides |
|
|
» Network Links |
|
|
|
 |
|
01-22-2002, 07:18 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mercer Co., Ohio - Beer drinking capital of the world
Posts: 144
|
A friend of mine just came back from Yamaha service school. The factory people told them that the RX-1 beat the SRX by 8 sled lengths in 600 ft. That is fast. Those of you out there with open minds will bve impressed by this. But there are those who can't imagine that any brand other than their own could build a good sled. Sooner or later we all have to realize that all the manufacturers make good sleds. They all have had their pink elephants too.
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher . . . If you can read it in English, thank a soldier.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-22-2002, 07:23 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: near Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 337
|
whooowee, that is fast!!
Yamaha has definitely pushed the envelope just a little farther and built a top-notch sled. *Can't wait to see what it inspires the others to come out with.
__________________
Ride Hard, Ride Safe, Ride Sober.......And Everyone Lives to Ride Another Day
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 11:16 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Grand Ledge Michigan
Posts: 311
|
wink, did he have any figures on top speed? *Also, did he have any negative remarks? *Any at all like maybe it's harder to get to things because of space. *I find people to be more believable if they throw something negative about things rather than saying it's perfect in every way.
__________________
MightyMach
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 01:29 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 125
|
8 sleds faster than SRX. *Thats pretty good, I just heard 6 from my dealer. *Are these going to be tunable? *Many "tweaked" sleds nowadays are more than 6 lengths faster than a bone stock SRX.
__________________
How fast do you want to go?
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 02:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mercer Co., Ohio - Beer drinking capital of the world
Posts: 144
|
He said they didn't have one there to see. It was the watercraft school. I just know that all the factory guys were raving about it. Didn't say anything about top speed. I'm sure there is some tweeking that can be done to this sled.
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher . . . If you can read it in English, thank a soldier.
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 02:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Readsboro, VT
Mileage: roughly 200
Primary Sled: 06 Crossfire 700 Sno Pro
Where I sled: Stamford VT, Readsboro VT, Woodford VT
Posts: 392
|
There's ALWAYS tweaking that can be done. *There are a lot more people (such as myself) that are more familiar with 4-stroke technology than 2-stroke technology, so I'll bet you'll see a wider range of tweaking ability. *Now instead of reeds exhaust & heads, you get to play with the intake, exhaust, heads, cams, and timing. *Plus, with a clean burning 4-stroke, a closed-loop MPFI system won't be a hard thing to build. *I suspect that the 4-stroke will respond extremely well to forced induction with proper cam selection (i.e. a wide lobe separation angle).
Lots of possibilities. *
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 02:49 PM
|
#7
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Methuen, MA
Posts: 18
|
 Slap some NOS on that puppie outta get you 0-dead in about 3 seconds
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 06:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
Lifetime Premium
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Primary Sled: 2008 Crossfire 800 Nightfire
Where I sled: Munising
Posts: 2,885
|
Now settle down here a little. Last spring, the Viper was supposedly going to out run the SRX till 80MPH, and that never happened. The hype got to everyone last year, even me. So I am going to be wait till I get a honset opinion.
This thing is still going to weigh 600+ lbs!!! that is heavy!!! SRX weighs 565 lbs. Yam says the RX1 will weigh within 5%, so that is 593 lbs!! Add 10 gallons of gas @ approx 7lbs a gallon, that is almost 700lbs.
There are things that would bother me about what Yam. is doing with the RX1. I think it is the way to go, and the technology is ready to take advantage of 4 storke performance. But Yam. is going to use a gear reduction off the end of the crank to slow down the 10,000+ rpm to make it clutchable. Yamaha had this on the VMAX4s, and it plagued the sleds. After a year or two, these gearboxes started to wear, and the performance went out the window.
I think the time is right, and praise that at least 1 manufacturer is pursueing the future of our sport. Just step back and wait fellas, let the technology come to us. Don't let the manufacturers use us as the test bed!!
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 06:49 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 87
|
6-8 lengths in 660' over my srx? *I would have to see it to believe it. * in 660 that's waaaaaay too much. *IF it does... how many spare belts does this machine hold?
|
|
|
01-22-2002, 08:17 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sw. Minn.
Where I sled: Mn. Wyoming, Utah, Wisc.
Posts: 1,139
|
It would be hard to get a 150hp or less sled that weighs more 64 ft. ahead in1-8th mile, than a sled with only 10 less ponies. The Rx-1 has a more aggressive stock track for holeshots though. But not 6- 8 lengths. The Srx was lacking something big time.
__________________
sharkey the snowman
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|