Zrt 800 Or Mach Z - Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
http://www.snowmobileworld.com/forums
» Sponsors
Go Back   Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > SNOWMOBILING SECTION > GENERAL SNOWMOBILING

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2003, 03:40 PM   #1
WeaSiL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Springfield, ON (southeast of london by about 30 mins)
Where I sled: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 102
Default

I am looking at buying one of these 2 sleds. A 1997 ZRT 800, or a 1997 MACH Z.

I can't decide which to get and can't find any reviews or anything to compare the 2.

I like the mach z because it is supposed to have a lot of power, but it doesn't have nearly as much suspension travel. How does the ZRT 800 compare in power ? I know it has quite a bit of travel and that might be the deciding factor.

any help is appreciated.
__________________
True geek and lover of the outdoors
check www.8-bit.ca to learn more.
WeaSiL is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-29-2003, 03:57 PM   #2
Sled Dogg
Senior Member
 
Sled Dogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Blissfield,MI
Where I sled: I sled where I can find snow or water LOL!!!!!
Posts: 2,646
Send a message via Yahoo to Sled Dogg
Default

Oh boy is this going to be a debate starter!!! I don't think anyone would say the doo rides better. The 97 cats were the first year for the ETT rear suspension giving much more suspension travel. YOu can also add coupler blocks to it easily. I'm not familier with the 97 mach as to wether it's a 780 or 809 motor. Both sleds have close to the same power. If it was my money I'd go for the cat as parts are everywhere for them and they are a awesome all around package!!!
__________________
Caleb Lamley
Quick Oil Change Managment & Consulting
Sled Dogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 04:06 PM   #3
97cougar
Senior Member
 
97cougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WINDSOR,ME(3 mile pond)
Posts: 453
Default

I would go with Cat just for the ride quality for top speed i think the mach z might have it because of less suspention therfore sitting lower to the ground more lake racer style.As for trail riding and then hitting the lakes i think the suspention goes to cat.if your trail riding. if just racing friends on the Ice i may lean towards the Mach z! TOUGH choice!!! Both very nice old school muscle machines!
Would like to know if it is the 780 or 809??????????????
__________________
97 550 COUGAR(parts sled)
94 INDY POLARIS DELUXE(girlfriends)
02 A/C 2X4 250 (my 9yr olds)
97cougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 04:24 PM   #4
machz69
Senior Member
 
machz69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: timmins ontario canada
Where I sled: northern ontario
Posts: 1,859
Send a message via AIM to machz69 Send a message via MSN to machz69
Default

yeah i would say both of these sleds are nice. i have always liked the 97`s both cat and bomb.the only thing i find is that the cat does seem older. (older looking). as far as power well it will go to the machz hands down. the 97 does have the 809. they really are a good running sled. the 97 machz is more comparable to the 97 tcat. now with that being said its really a matter of preference. you could always get some 900 or 1000 cylinders for the cat....hehehe.
__________________
http://groups.msn.com/machz69
PLAYING WITH POWER
machz69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 04:36 PM   #5
dawg
Senior Member
 
dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fredericton (freddy) New Brunswick Canada
Primary Sled: 2004 f6 efi
Where I sled: New Brunswick
Posts: 4,733
Send a message via MSN to dawg Send a message via Yahoo to dawg
Default

thats almost a toss up, i would go with the cat. because like everyone has said, they r a better trial sled. the doo chassis in that year with heavey of engine/with triple pipes wasnt much of a sled when it came to hitting the trials hard. just my .02. i am sure someone will think different.
dawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 05:52 PM   #6
377safari
Senior Member
 
377safari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orillia
Primary Sled: 1997 Skidoo mxz 583
Where I sled: Orillia Ontairo
Posts: 493
Send a message via MSN to 377safari
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by 97cougar@Jul 29 2003, 02:06 PM
Would like to know if it is the 780 or 809??????????????
a 1997 would be an 809.
__________________
1999 Ford F-150 stepside
1997 MXZ 583
1994 Safari Deluxe
1992 Kawasaki Jet Ski 750ss MOD-for sale
1985 honda nighthawk 750S
377safari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 06:04 PM   #7
dawg
Senior Member
 
dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fredericton (freddy) New Brunswick Canada
Primary Sled: 2004 f6 efi
Where I sled: New Brunswick
Posts: 4,733
Send a message via MSN to dawg Send a message via Yahoo to dawg
Default

weasil, this should have a poll on it, make things a bit easier for u when trying to figure out howmany r for which sled.
dawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 06:36 PM   #8
SKI-DOOD
Senior Member
 
SKI-DOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deseronto,Ontario
Primary Sled: 2000 Mach Z
Where I sled: Mostly on the Bay of Quinte
Posts: 546
Default

As most said, if you are using it as a trail sled, then yes the Cat.
if you are using it for power then the Mach Z As MachZ69 says. the Machz is more in tune with the Tcat when it comes to the power issue.

__________________
2000 Mach Z

2002 Quest 650

2001 jeep Grand Cherokee
SKI-DOOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 10:49 PM   #9
Beerman
Senior Member
 
Beerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: S.E. MI, N42 39.74 W82 49.94
Mileage: 1609 Miles
Primary Sled: 2000 TCat
Where I sled: Michigan, Ontario
Posts: 886
Send a message via ICQ to Beerman
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SKI-DOOD@Jul 29 2003, 04:36 PM
As most said, if you are using it as a trail sled, then yes the Cat.
if you are using it for power then the Mach Z As MachZ69 says. the Machz is more in tune with the Tcat when it comes to the power issue.
Agreed. But the ZRT 800 is no slouch. When I first rode my '95 I was only used to 500-600 cc twins. I thought the 800 was going to pull my arms out of the socket, I had a grin from ear-to-ear. My '95 is probably pretty close to a '97 Mach Z as far as the rear suspension goes and on rough trails it's a back breaker.
__________________
Art Tyszka

"Hold the handlebars tight and let go of everything else."
Beerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2003, 10:59 PM   #10
paidncash
Senior Member
 
paidncash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chazy, NY
Where I sled: Lake Champlain and the Adirondack mountians of upstate NY
Posts: 677
Send a message via AIM to paidncash
Default

Where the hell is Machzzzz1 when you need him


I just sold my 97 Mach last winter and can tell you a bit about it. The sled pushes real bad in the corners and takes a strong man to really ride it hard through the tight twisties, also the suspension is ok at best, if you ride mainly gromed trails or lakes then it will be fine but if your trying to keep up with your buddies on MXZ's then your in for a real workout. But on the other side it's super fast, stock for stock the Mach will eat the ZRT no problem. If you want a fast sled and don't care about getting pounded to death on the rough trails then get the Mach, thats my opinion hope it helps.
__________________
There is a thin line between fishing and a man standing on shore.
paidncash is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.