» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
|
|
» Buyers Guides |
|
|
|
» Network Links |
|
|
|
 |
02-09-2004, 08:13 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: central wisconsin
Primary Sled: 95 Formula Z
Where I sled: Anywhere I get the chance.....
Posts: 63
|
Just like it says, the local junk yard has a ton of sleds, which models have the SC10-II? Thanks for the help guys-Dan
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
02-09-2004, 08:53 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere, where I don't know where I am.
Mileage: who has snow?
Primary Sled: MXZ Renegade X 600 SDI
Where I sled: Parry Sound-Magnetawan Area
Posts: 1,327
|
Anything with the ZX chassis in 2000/2001 I believe.
the SC-100-III was release in 02 was it not??
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2004, 10:29 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: central wisconsin
Primary Sled: 95 Formula Z
Where I sled: Anywhere I get the chance.....
Posts: 63
|
Any older models? Also, whats he difference between the SC10 and the 10 II? How about the III? Ive heard the mounting is different on the III, I'm looking to put a new skid in my sled which has the C7 right now. Thanks-Dan
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 01:57 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fergus, Ontario
Primary Sled: 2007 mxzx 440/800
Where I sled: Wellington County, Belwood Lake, over highways....
Posts: 1,244
|
is the suspension going into your f-z?? if so id just stick with the sc-10. they're usually cheaper and will be a huge upgrade from your c7. i installed an sc-10 into my buddies stx 583 in the fall. it works good, but it sits up a lot higher than stock and has more inside ski lift. not big deal tho.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 03:09 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 47.29.33.32N 92.51.53.38W; 1552ft
Primary Sled: '95
Where I sled: around here
Posts: 3,183
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dpaige@Feb 9 2004, 07:53 PM
Anything with the ZX chassis in 2000/2001 I believe.
the SC-100-III was release in 02 was it not??
|
Nope that's wrong.
It's easy to remember: SC-10ii goes thru '02, SC-10iii was released in '03.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 04:24 PM
|
#6
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Where I sled: UP & Ontario
Posts: 15
|
dpaige is right. The SC10 was 99, sc 10 2 00-01, & the 3 has been in since 02. There is a huge difference in ride quality between the SC-10 & the SC-10 2, the 3 is better than the 2 but not a whole bunch.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 04:38 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ottawa
Mileage: 2200 kms
Primary Sled: 2004 rev renegade 800 ho black and crome
Where I sled: notre-dame-de-la-salette, quebec
Posts: 963
|
you can get a complete used in A-1 condition sc-10 for about 600.00$ CDN easy. I personaly liked the sc-10 with AD boivin kit better over the sc-10 3. Just my opinion 
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 04:56 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 45
|
"It's easy to remember: SC-10ii goes thru '02, SC-10iii was released in '03."
My '02 MXZ Sport clearly says SC 10 III on the skid.
Rich
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 05:00 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Where I sled: northeast, Oregon, Colorado
Posts: 351
|
sc102 was introduced on the 99 mxzx 440. In 2000 it was used more.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2004, 05:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 47.29.33.32N 92.51.53.38W; 1552ft
Primary Sled: '95
Where I sled: around here
Posts: 3,183
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich@Feb 10 2004, 03:56 PM
"It's easy to remember: SC-10ii goes thru '02, SC-10iii was released in '03."
My '02 MXZ Sport clearly says SC 10 III on the skid.
Rich
|
You are right. My bad.
I made the mistake because I only looked at the Renegade, which had the sc-10ii in '02, but was upgraded to the sc-10iii for '03.
On that note, I just noticed ski-doo.com has the '05 Renegade Limited online. Looks darn cool!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
