» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
|
» Buyers Guides |
|
|
» Network Links |
|
|
|
 |
|
09-10-2005, 03:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoosier-ville
Primary Sled: Tcat
Where I sled: WI and da UP
Posts: 3,107
|
Looking to buy the K&N kit for my '02 Yukon XL. Has anyone purchased this kit for your trucks? Looks like it will be in the neighborhood of $280. Will never have to buy filters again. Any comments would be great.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
09-10-2005, 04:04 PM
|
#2
|
|
journeyman sled/motorhead
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana/Irons michigan
Mileage: 282
Primary Sled: 06 renegade 800 HO
Where I sled: Irons michigan,or where there is snow
Posts: 4,440
|
voids warrantee on our diesels. I prefer the afe filter to k+n, and cummins is ok with them. http://www.advancedflowengineering.com not the right url sorry
__________________
"DREAM AS THOUGH YOU'LL LIVE FOREVER, LIVE AS THOUGH YOU'RE GOING TO DIE TOMMORROW" JAMES DEAN
|
|
|
09-10-2005, 04:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saint Lazare, QC.
Primary Sled: 2005 MXz Adrenalin 800HO
Where I sled: Northern Ontario
Posts: 2,782
|
Keep in mind that a turbo charged diesel pulls twice the air as a similarly equipped gas engine. K&N like alot of others use the same air filter. Just using a K&N replacement air filter on a 6.6 Duramax is the kiss of death. The stock OEM filter element is reinforced with expanded steel on one side and beads of hot glue on the open side. The K&N gas engine "Carry Over" will colapse like an accordian when it gets partially restricted allowing all dirt & debris to enter the engine. Who was it that said "Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later" !!!
__________________
Located in Western Quebec
Kilos traveled this season 2750
|
|
|
09-10-2005, 10:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: just south of the snowbelt
Mileage: 210
Primary Sled: 96 zrt 600
Where I sled: I`m not sure . I`m allways lost when I get there
Posts: 2,882
|
the k&n kit is the cold air kit you are referring to right? what bothers me about those kit`s is the perception that snow dust might be an issue . i have never had an open element like that so i cant say for sure...i did have a regular k&n in my fullsize bronco and i really liked it . M
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 08:44 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoosier-ville
Primary Sled: Tcat
Where I sled: WI and da UP
Posts: 3,107
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Thumbdoctor@Sep 10 2005, 04:37 PM
Keep in mind that a turbo charged diesel pulls twice the air as a similarly equipped gas engine. K&N like alot of others use the same air filter. Just using a K&N replacement air filter on a 6.6 Duramax is the kiss of death. The stock OEM filter element is reinforced with expanded steel on one side and beads of hot glue on the open side. The K&N gas engine "Carry Over" will colapse like an accordian when it gets partially restricted allowing all dirt & debris to enter the engine. Who was it that said "Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later" !!!
[snapback]431351[/snapback]
|
So are these replacement filters still so poor? The guy at the parts counter was really raving about this filter. I told him I didn't want to put $45 in to a filter if I may go with the whole kit in the near future. Are any other brands better?
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 10:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saint Lazare, QC.
Primary Sled: 2005 MXz Adrenalin 800HO
Where I sled: Northern Ontario
Posts: 2,782
|
I'm not going to recommend any brand on this cold air system question (cause I don't know all thats available). Here are some facts I do know.
1) GM has Dyno tested a lot of these products and found little performance increase (read imperceptible from the drivers seat) or reduced performance due to emission system roll back.
2) When air filter maintenance is left up to the average consumer it is generally overlooked (after-market air filters need to be washed and oiled).
3) Some of these systems (not all) do offer improvement in volumetric efficiency when combined with other engine equipment such as Free flowing exhaust systems, Belt / exhaust driven super chargers, high lift / duration camshafts.
4) Factory air cleaner units operate best within the Load / RPM parameters the vehicle was designed to operate. More RPM = more fuel consumption.
5) Some vehicle manufacturers / dealers are looking for a "scapegoat" to blame any warrantable driveability problem or catastrophic drivetrain failure on after-market add ons. It is the burden of said manufacturer / dealer to prove the cause of the failure.
6) A lot of add ons generally reduce the fuel mileage due to the placebo (sounds cool) effect where the operator is actually the cause of the reduced fuel economy.
In closing, I believe some of these products do deliver what they allege as long as you read & understand the fine print and disclaimers. The real question is:
Are you getting real value for your investment dollar ?
A wiser man than me once said " Good, Fast, Cheap, Take any one away and chances are, you don't get the other two".
End of Sunday sermon
__________________
Located in Western Quebec
Kilos traveled this season 2750
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 12:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: just south of the snowbelt
Mileage: 210
Primary Sled: 96 zrt 600
Where I sled: I`m not sure . I`m allways lost when I get there
Posts: 2,882
|
fwiw i picked up 1 mpg constant on every tank after the install .and it did sound cool when i put my foot in it . the filter had 150000 miles on it when i got rid of it and looked like the day i put it in .i cleaned it once a year on easter weekend so i could remember.your experience may differ from mine ,i`m just throwing in my .02 cent`s
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 02:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Greg @ Slippery Rock, PA
Mileage: 0.1
Primary Sled: 2004 600 HO REV Adrenaline
Where I sled: Butler and Marienville Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,708
|
My brother has one on his Z-24 Cavalier and has also put a exhaust on from the header back. He has said numerous times that he has picked up gas mileage. Probably about 2mpg, as far as horsepower, nothing that he can tell just by driving it. He put the intake and the exhaust on at the same time, so cant say if one or the other increased the gas mileage.
__________________
04 REV 600 HO Adrenaline
05 REV GTX 600 HO SDI
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 04:14 PM
|
#9
|
|
journeyman sled/motorhead
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana/Irons michigan
Mileage: 282
Primary Sled: 06 renegade 800 HO
Where I sled: Irons michigan,or where there is snow
Posts: 4,440
|
I agree with you doc, however the biggest restriction in my truck was the intake system gaining over 280cfm @26in of air through the newer one. they design them to be quiet and cheap(really number 1) as well which is a downer when it comes to air movement. I would by the cleanable filter just for that, not looking for any other gains. now diesel I will promise you differant results. noting in our testing we seen a drop in egts of over 300 degrees with the change, I can assure you it was from more air entering the system. drop allowed us the fuel to push 50rwhp more at the safe temps. http://www.afefilters.com
__________________
"DREAM AS THOUGH YOU'LL LIVE FOREVER, LIVE AS THOUGH YOU'RE GOING TO DIE TOMMORROW" JAMES DEAN
|
|
|
09-13-2005, 01:16 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Primary Sled: 1994 Ski-Doo Formula STX
Where I sled: Ontario
Posts: 2,303
|
i made a CAI for my car and although the gains are few they are noticeable, and you hear an awesome sucking sound under WOT.
__________________
1994 Ski-Doo Formula STX 583 Rave
1994 Chevrolet Lumina Z34
1997 Dodge Ram 1500 4X4
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|