Long Track vs. Short Track - Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
http://www.snowmobileworld.com/forums
» Sponsors
Go Back   Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > SNOWMOBILING SECTION > GENERAL SNOWMOBILING

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2008, 10:53 PM   #1
j_lutter31
Senior Member
 
j_lutter31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central South Dakota
Primary Sled: 1998 Polaris RMK 600
Where I sled: Central South Dakota
Posts: 241
Default Long Track vs. Short Track

I know that you pretty much have to have a LT to go mountain sledding of any type....but are there any disadvantages to a long track? The riding will mostly be in pastures and ditches......
__________________
1998 Polaris RMK 600
1998 Polaris XCF
1981 Arctic Cat El Tigre 6000

2010 Ford Fusion

1994 Ford Mustang GT
1992 Ford F-150
1948 Willys CJ2A

j_lutter31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-28-2008, 11:01 PM   #2
citationls
Senior Member
 
citationls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Connecticut
Mileage: 735
Primary Sled: 1996 Skidoo Formula SLS
Where I sled: New Hampshire
Posts: 301
Send a message via AIM to citationls
Default

They probably aren't as maneuverable on the trails but I'm pretty sure the real use for long tracks is in deep snow (which happens to be in the mountains) because it gives you more surface area and more track to push you along. I don't think it'll mater in fields and ditches. Probably just on tight trials.
-Dave
__________________
Ya I'd say its official now, winter in Connecticut sucks. Rain/sleet/freezing rain in winter??

"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it."


Current Sleds:
1996 Formula SLS
1989 Jag 440 AFS
1986 Citation LS

Previous Sleds:
1972 Olympique
citationls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:11 PM   #3
j_lutter31
Senior Member
 
j_lutter31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central South Dakota
Primary Sled: 1998 Polaris RMK 600
Where I sled: Central South Dakota
Posts: 241
Default

The only reason I ask is because a neighbor is looking to get rid of his 01 RMK 700 144"
__________________
1998 Polaris RMK 600
1998 Polaris XCF
1981 Arctic Cat El Tigre 6000

2010 Ford Fusion

1994 Ford Mustang GT
1992 Ford F-150
1948 Willys CJ2A

j_lutter31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 09:21 AM   #4
Smackz
Senior Member
 
Smackz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fraser, CO
Mileage: 2450
Primary Sled: 04 King Cat 900
Where I sled: Winterpark, Colorado
Posts: 185
Send a message via Yahoo to Smackz
Default

anything 136 or bigger, my king was shorted to 136 from 153 for better handling and I can go anywhere a 162 can go and prolly more lol in some places and we ride at 10000ft and up. I definatly kick all there buts on trails as with the 136 I can turn way better.
__________________
<div align="center">Bear Claw</div>
<div align="center">http://www.snowmobileworld.com/forum..._322_23562.gif</div>
<div align="center">http://rockymountainboondockerz.myfreeforum.org/</div>
Smackz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 11:44 AM   #5
citationls
Senior Member
 
citationls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Connecticut
Mileage: 735
Primary Sled: 1996 Skidoo Formula SLS
Where I sled: New Hampshire
Posts: 301
Send a message via AIM to citationls
Default

How much is he selling it for? How many miles are on it? And how much snow is usually on the ground where you live? And do you go off jumps very often?
__________________
Ya I'd say its official now, winter in Connecticut sucks. Rain/sleet/freezing rain in winter??

"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it."


Current Sleds:
1996 Formula SLS
1989 Jag 440 AFS
1986 Citation LS

Previous Sleds:
1972 Olympique
citationls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:01 PM   #6
j_lutter31
Senior Member
 
j_lutter31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central South Dakota
Primary Sled: 1998 Polaris RMK 600
Where I sled: Central South Dakota
Posts: 241
Default

When he told me he wanted to sell it, I looked it up on KBB and it said a little over 2500 and he said 2500-3000 would sound about right.....We have a pretty crappy snowfall here in central SD. Hopefully we will get a couple more snowfalls before spring. Before it all melted here we were riding on i'm guessin a foot or less.....I'll jump approaches in the ditches but everything else is pretty flat ground. If we got alot of snow I might have some drifts to jump.....but its been pretty bleak around here....

I spose a long track could be tough to turn around in a ditch....(i dunno if it has carbides or not) I literally just put some woody carbides on the XCF so i'm hopin that will improve the steering drastically.....the XCF has been pretty tough to steer in low snow spots....
__________________
1998 Polaris RMK 600
1998 Polaris XCF
1981 Arctic Cat El Tigre 6000

2010 Ford Fusion

1994 Ford Mustang GT
1992 Ford F-150
1948 Willys CJ2A

j_lutter31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 09:34 AM   #7
billww
Premium Member
 
billww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: wisconsin Beaver dam
Mileage: 1500++
Primary Sled: 1998 Summit 670 600zl cat
Where I sled: WIS Beaver Dam Or a snow coverd lake
Posts: 1,394
Send a message via Yahoo to billww
Default

I have a long track and like it a lot , when we have deep snow and big drifts I go first or we dig out the other sleds a lot
__________________
670 SKIdoo
billww is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 11:29 AM   #8
michahicks
Senior Member
 
michahicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,560
Default

The RMK will feel like a bus when compared to an XCF....

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_lutter31 View Post
When he told me he wanted to sell it, I looked it up on KBB and it said a little over 2500 and he said 2500-3000 would sound about right.....We have a pretty crappy snowfall here in central SD. Hopefully we will get a couple more snowfalls before spring. Before it all melted here we were riding on i'm guessin a foot or less.....I'll jump approaches in the ditches but everything else is pretty flat ground. If we got alot of snow I might have some drifts to jump.....but its been pretty bleak around here....

I spose a long track could be tough to turn around in a ditch....(i dunno if it has carbides or not) I literally just put some woody carbides on the XCF so i'm hopin that will improve the steering drastically.....the XCF has been pretty tough to steer in low snow spots....
__________________
'07 Apex RTX w/Pro X suspension conversion, Fox Floats w/resi's, Doo extro drivers, Cobra track, Dual Ryde FX rear clickers, .375 Edge torsion springs, HyGear Dual rate front skid springs, SLP anti-stab kit, Powermadd handguards/mirrors, 2" Rox riser, shimmed Poo skis w/custom (homemade) ski savers, Black chrome W/S, Graphics by Arctic FX, and a grin every time I think about it! New Project: 600HO Fusion bump sled, Air 2.0 w/hi/low valves, HRM spindles, Retro graphics, .359 torsion springs.
michahicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 04:14 PM   #9
dlaine
Senior Member
 
dlaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Twin Cities MN
Primary Sled: 08 Renegade 600, 87 El Tigre
Where I sled: MN, MT
Posts: 535
Default

The biggest thing to watch out for is burning up your hyfax if you are riding a large-lug track in low-snow conditions. A friend of mine burned up a brand-new set of hyfax in about 80 miles by riding his mountain sled (I think 2" paddle track) on icy trails.

Also mountain sleds are usually narrower and the suspension is intentionally make less stable so it is easier to tip from side to side when maneuvering through deep powder. They don't handle as well when riding on trails.

If you are usually riding ditches this may work pretty well for you. The 144 isn't insanely long so you should be able to turn it pretty well. I have a 136" and I love it on the trails. I will never go back to a 121" sled.

dave
__________________
Waiting for snow again...
dlaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 07:36 PM   #10
window
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
Default Long Track

Agree with Dave. Long track, (137" vs 121) on trails, is the way to go. The shorter tracks get tail happy (loose) in my experience.
window is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.