Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum

Snowmobile World : Your #1 Snowmobile Forum (https://www.snowmobileworld.com/forums/)
-   MOUNTAIN & POWDER RIDING (https://www.snowmobileworld.com/forums/105-mountain-powder-riding/)
-   -   What Track Length Do You Prefer? (https://www.snowmobileworld.com/forums/105-mountain-powder-riding/43867-what-track-length-do-you-prefer.html)

VerticalEscapeRMK 04-05-2005 11:26 PM

I like my 159" track. I have always had a 136" track for years but this season I rode a 144" and a 159". I didn't find that the 159" was harder to handle than the 144" much at all but in the steep hills it will go higher.

permafrost 04-06-2005 07:24 AM

I picked 136", but that is all I know :( IMHO it is the best alround length for the area I live in.

Permafrost

labudda 04-06-2005 08:54 AM

I voted for the 136" as well. I can't to much mountain riding but I just don't see giving up totally on trails. And I would want the shorter track for that. If there were no trails just MT's..... proly a 144".

VerticalEscapeRMK 04-06-2005 10:37 AM

Where's the western boys? :thumbsup:

I agree that a 136" with a decent paddle will take you to a lot of places, we always had 136" tracks before they all went longer. But, when it gets deep and really steep the longer tracks are wonderfull. :hallo1:

RMKcowboy 04-06-2005 02:13 PM

144 is all I know and I love it, but (1) I've only rode this sled about 200 miles and (2) I never got a chance to do any climbing this year. IMO, anything over a 151 is just for bragging rights. Two identical sleds with different length tracks can climb the same height on the same mountain, it's 90% rider.

VerticalEscapeRMK 04-06-2005 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RMKcowboy@Apr 6 2005, 12:13 PM
* IMO, anything over a 151 is just for bragging rights.* Two identical sleds with different length tracks can climb the same height on the same mountain, it's 90% rider.
[snapback]416478[/snapback]

I agree on any day that it hasn't snowed for a while and the hills have a thick hard crust over it the difference between the lengths doesn't matter much. However, on days that it had just snowed and you are pushing powder the longer tracks do make a difference climbing and staying on top the snow. But, I have found those conditions to be not very often around here so in most cases....I agree with you.

If you are going to compare two identical sleds with different length tracks you have to assume they both have the same rider since we are comparing snowmobiles and not snowmobile riders. :)

VerticalEscapeRMK 04-07-2005 11:17 AM

5 votes? :dazed: :D

gman086 04-08-2005 12:40 AM

15x144 - best for out here. Short enough so as not to be a burden in tight trees and twisties and long enough to float up in powder. 16" wide tracks are a fad (don't sidehill as well nor lay over as well for powder carving) as are anything longer than 151 (except for maybe utah with the light powder they get there). 136'rs are for midwesterners wishing they lived out here! :D

Have Fun,

G MAN

RMKcowboy 04-08-2005 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VerticalEscapeRMK@Apr 6 2005, 01:38 PM
I agree on any day that it hasn't snowed for a while and the hills have a thick hard crust over it the difference between the lengths doesn't matter much. However, on days that it had just snowed and you are pushing powder the longer tracks do make a difference climbing and staying on top the snow. But, I have found those conditions to be not very often around here so in most cases....I agree with you.
I'd be willing to bet that 90% of the time or more my 144" would do every bit as good as your 159" machine. I really think that the super long tracks are just a marketing scheme. There is a lot to be said for track speed and technique in fluffy snow.

Quote:

If you are going to compare two identical sleds with different length tracks you have to assume they both have the same rider since we are comparing snowmobiles and not snowmobile riders. :)
[snapback]416483[/snapback]

What I meant was if the same guy went up the same hill on my sled or an identical 700 with a 151 he wouldn't climb any higher. With me at the controls, it wouldn't matter much because I've never done any climbing before and my "high mark" would make most mountain riders laugh until they peed themselves :D

VerticalEscapeRMK 04-08-2005 01:53 AM

Well I still slightly disagree. I still say a 151-159 will take you places a 144" just won't make it, in the right conditions of course. :D

As far as the long tracks being a marketing scheme...i say they are here to stay and will only get slightly longer. Reason is they really don't make that much of a difference with a tipped rail you can't even hardly tell on harder snow. I rode our '04 700/144 Vertical Escape early this year for a few trips and moved to my 800/159" Vertical Escape later this year when I bought it. I couldnt tell a difference at all, besides the extra climbing power from the bigger motor and longer track.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome